For my project, I observed a construction site just behind the College of Information.
I felt extremely self-conscious while writing my notes. For one, construction workers–typically males–are often stereotyped as “cat callers.” I was aware of the irony of my observing a group of men who are, generally speaking, often criticized for how they presumably observe women. For another, I would venture to guess that construction workers usually feel invisible in terms of how society views or interacts with them as they complete their tasks…and there I was gazing at them. At least one man noticed me as I watched the group. I wondered if he felt it odd that an outsider was interested in them. Fortunately, when my laptop’s mouse pad froze, I was able to switch note-taking methods so I ended up using the voice recorder app on my phone. I felt less conspicuous as I spoke into my phone.
When it came to turning my notes into a narrative description, first I realized that I had not chosen a very good place to focus because I was interrupted a number of times. Thus, I learned the importance of solitude when transcribing or analyzing. Moreover, I was very aware of the fact that some of my notes (i.e. Hispanic male workers, white male supervisor) may be controversial. I omitted some notes on the basis that they were button-pushing. I later learned that it is okay to note sensitive information so long as I don’t interpose interpretation.
I admit that I don’t recall any of my partner’s questions at the present moment. Nevertheless, the partner assignment was particularly enlightening. I was impressed by how often my partner quantified information. I opted for a verbal approach but, after exchanging paragraphs and posing questions, I recognized the benefits of quantitative subject data. I believe that it lends itself to balance and neutrality. Aside from the six Hispanic workers and one white supervisor note, I didn’t include quantitative data. Instead, I described the sounds, activities and structures at the scene.